Three great articles on "Twilight"
Dec. 6th, 2008 12:45 pmThese have to be the most balanced articles I've read on the whole "Twilight" phenomenon. They're relatively squee-free (not that squeeing is a bad thing, but it can cloud your judgment when it's immoderate or disproportionate to the object of squeeing):
This one on why it doesn't work as good literature:
http://www.salon.com/books/review/2008/07/30/Twilight/
This on why it does and doesn't:
http://www.decentfilms.com/sections/articles/twilight.html
And this on why it does:
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200812/twilight-vampires
The last two are enough to convince me to give it another shot... Though yes, I will be doing so with a pencil in hand to jot down snarkage.
This one on why it doesn't work as good literature:
http://www.salon.com/books/review/2008/07/30/Twilight/
This on why it does and doesn't:
http://www.decentfilms.com/sections/articles/twilight.html
And this on why it does:
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200812/twilight-vampires
The last two are enough to convince me to give it another shot... Though yes, I will be doing so with a pencil in hand to jot down snarkage.